Sustainability: Out-Live Out-Last Out-Reach  Poster Hall

Welcome, guest
Home
Keynote
  Audio Introduction
  Paper
Discussion
Poster Hall
  Enter Hall
  Presenters
Panel
  Teacher Leadership
  Sustainability and Funding
Discussants Reflect
Resources
Who's Here
  Instant Message Center
  Registrants
  Participating Projects
Info Center
  About the conference
  Get Help
  Feedback
  Schedule
  Downloads
  FAQs
Poster: Pushes & Pulls: Grassroots Cultivation of Science Literacy or Top-Down Enforcement of Standards?
Main Discussion
Topics
Read Posts
on this Topic

This message is in reply to:
Court Intervention - Dean Fink

Posted by: Jacalyn Willis
Posted on: May 18, 2001 at 1:15 PM
Message:
Well, I wouldn't call this "systemic" in any sense of that word. These interventions are referred to in NJ as "Whole School Reform models" and there are perhaps 12 that the state DOE has chosen for adoption by the floundering urban districts. Each school in a district is required to choose one model from perhaps 6 or more that the district has agreed to buy (and they pay dearly for them!) So each district has multiple divergent models in use in various schools. And none are required to address that district curriculum, nor do they necessarily meet the state standards in science education! The WSR staff work rather independently of the district supervisors, going into schools and providing training and new curriculum. So, this is major conflict: but see my response to Larry-- there are some islands of positive results, usually associated with the Comer and Connect models.

--Jackie Willis

Further Replies or Comments: